🔬 Poisson Frequencies Calculator

Poisson Distributions of Phage Adsorption to Bacteria, from Actual Multiplicity of Infection (MOIactual)

by Stephen T. Abedon Ph.D. (abedon.1@osu.edu)

phage.org | phage-therapy.org | biologyaspoetry.org | abedon.phage.org | google scholar

Jump to:   🔬 Calculator  |  📖 Background  |  🧮 More Calculators

What is the Poisson Frequencies Calculator? Phages adsorb to isolated, planktonic bacteria with frequencies described by the Poisson distribution — because a single bacterium can be adsorbed by more than one phage. Starting from an actual multiplicity of infection (MOIactual), the ratio of adsorbed phages to adsorbable bacteria, this tool predicts the fraction of bacteria adsorbed by zero, one, two, or more phages, reported both per adsorbable bacterium and per actually adsorbed bacterium.

Related calculators: Killing Titer · Inundative Phage Density · Phage Adsorptions · Bacterial Half-Life

To cite this tool: Abedon, S.T. (2026). Poisson Frequencies Calculator (Version 2026.07.08). poisson.phage.org.  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21036111

poisson.phage.org  ·  Abedon’s Books  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21036111

How can I improve this page?  contact: poisson@phage.org

Calculate Poisson Frequencies


MOIactual is the ratio of adsorbed phages to adsorbable bacteria (e.g. enter 1 for a 1:1 ratio). This is adsorbed phages, not added phages — see the Background tab.
Quick values:

Why Poisson distributions matter in phage biology

When free phages are mixed with susceptible bacteria, individual adsorption events are essentially independent and random. Because a single bacterium can be adsorbed by more than one phage, the number of phages that land on any given bacterium is not fixed but is distributed — and the default description of that distribution is the Poisson distribution. It resembles the familiar normal distribution, except that its values are discrete (integers only: 0, 1, 2, 3…) and never negative. Rather than a single average, it tells you what fraction of bacteria are expected to have been adsorbed by exactly zero phages, by exactly one, by exactly two, and so on. More than fifty years ago, Mark Adams urged that the student of phage should be familiar with the Poisson distribution, and that advice still holds: it is the bridge between how many phages you add and what actually happens to the bacteria.

The single most useful number: the zero term

The Poisson distribution is driven by one parameter, the average number of phages adsorbed per bacterium — the actual multiplicity of infection, MOIactual. The most practically important quantity that falls out of it is the zero term: the expected fraction of bacteria adsorbed by no phages at all, which equals simply e−MOI. If phages cannot or do not replicate, that is also the fraction of bacteria expected to survive. Its complement, 1 − e−MOI, is the fraction expected to be adsorbed — and, for obligately lytic phages, the fraction expected to be killed. At MOIactual = 1, this means 37% of bacteria are expected to remain unadsorbed even though, on average, there is one phage per cell; at MOIactual = 5, fewer than 1% are expected to remain unadsorbed; at MOIactual = 10, survival drops to roughly e−10 ≈ 5 × 10−5, a better than 10,000-fold reduction.

Two counter-intuitive consequences

Because adsorption is distributed rather than uniform, two things happen that simple averaging hides. First, at low MOI there are expected to be more multiply-adsorbed bacteria than a naive "one phage each" picture suggests. Second, and more important for antibacterial use, at high MOI there is more bacterial survival than expected: to drive the unadsorbed fraction toward zero, most surviving-target bacteria must by necessity be adsorbed many times over. You cannot simply supply "enough" phages and assume total killing — the Poisson distribution predicts a surviving tail unless MOIactual is pushed high enough that e−MOI times the starting population falls below one cell.

Per adsorbable bacterium vs. per adsorbed bacterium

This calculator reports two views of the same distribution. The first is the fraction across all adsorbable bacteria. The second considers only those bacteria expected to be adsorbed at least once, obtained by dividing each n ≥ 1 frequency by (1 − e−MOI). The second view is often the more experimentally realistic one, since many experiments observe only infected cells. It also makes a useful point vivid: even at modest MOI, a meaningful share of adsorbed bacteria are expected to have been hit by more than one phage — relevant to phenomena such as lysis from without, multiplicity reactivation, and superinfection.

From distribution to dose: MOIactual, not MOIinput

A persistent source of confusion is that "multiplicity of infection" often gets used to mean multiplicity of addition — this is phages added per bacterium (MOIinput) — rather than phages that have actually adsorbed (MOIactual). Only the latter drives the Poisson distribution. Adsorption takes time, and over realistic intervals not every added phage adsorbs, so a ratio of phages added is not the same as a ratio of phages adsorbed. When MOIactual is paired correctly with the Poisson zero term, it underpins related quantities such as phage killing titers and the inundative phage densities needed to reduce a bacterial population by a target amount over a defined interval. In short, the Poisson distribution is what turns a phage titer into a prediction about bacterial survival.

References and further reading

  • Abedon, S.T. and Katsaounis, T.I. (2018). Basic phage mathematics. Methods in Molecular Biology 1681:3–30. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_1
  • Abedon, S.T. (2016). Phage therapy dosing: the problem(s) with multiplicity of infection (MOI). Bacteriophage 6:e1220348. 10.1080/21597081.2016.1220348
  • Abedon, S.T. (2022). Further considerations on how to improve phage therapy experimentation, practice, and reporting: pharmacodynamics perspectives. PHAGE 3:98–111. 10.1089/phage.2022.0019
  • Abedon, S.T. (2023). Automating predictive phage therapy pharmacology. Antibiotics 12:1423. 10.3390/antibiotics12091423
  • Dulbecco, R. (1949). On the reliability of the Poisson distribution as a distribution of the number of phage particles infecting individual bacteria. Genetics 34:122–125.
  • Adams, M.H. (1959). Bacteriophages. Interscience Publishers, New York.

🧮 Phage Biology, Phage Therapy, and Teaching Calculators

Loading calculators…
Poisson Frequencies Calculator — poisson.phage.org — DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21036111 — Version 2026.07.08